ircd/docs/INFO.md

93 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2017-07-01 21:38:33 +00:00
# Oragono Information
2017-07-01 21:55:02 +00:00
Here's a bunch of misc info about the Oragono server! This can include questions, plans on
how I'm going forward, how to properly use features, or why Oragono does/doesn't do
something.
Essentially, this document acts as a braindump about Oragono while we figure out a better
place to put all this information.
2017-07-01 21:38:33 +00:00
## Accounts and Channels
Most IRC servers out there offer IRC account and channel registration through external
services such as NickServ and ChanServ. In Oragono, we bundle accounts and channel ownership
in as a native server feature instead!
Because there's a lot of aspects of accounts/channels that haven't been specified as native
commands and all yet, Oragono includes the pseudo-clients NickServ and ChanServ to roughly
mimic the functionality that other IRCds get from services packages, in a user-facing set
of commands that's familiar to everyone.
The plan is to move more features and functionality (such as channel registration, channel
permissions and all) over to native commands first and to use the NickServ/ChanServ as
legacy interfaces to access these functions. However, it's gonna be a while before all of
this is specified by someone like the IRCv3 WG.
2017-09-25 01:09:58 +00:00
## PROXY
The PROXY command, specified by [HAProxy's PROXY v1 specifications](https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt),
allows someone to setup HAProxy in front of Oragono. This allows them to use HAProxy for
TLS negotiation (allowing older versions of SSL/TLS than Go's inbuilt TLS support does).
However, it also allows them to update TLS certificates by updating them with HAProxy,
rather than relying on our `REHASH` command (which is less-well-tested than I'd like
right now).
This is a toss-up of course  allowing older versions of TLS might be seen as undesired,
and I wouldn't use the feature myself, but it's useful for real-world installations which
is why it exists. The command is only allowed from specific hosts which should restrict it
appropriately.
2017-07-01 21:55:02 +00:00
## Server-to-Server Linking (or Federation)
Right now Oragono doesn't support linking multiple servers together. It's certainly planned,
but it's a fair while away.
When I do add S2S linking to Oragono, I want to use it as a testbed for a new sort of
linking protocol. Mostly, I want a meshy protocol that minimises the effects of netsplits
while still ensuring that messages get delivered, and preserves the AP nature of IRC
reliability (in terms of the CAP theorem), which is something that traditional solutions
based on the Raft protocol don't do.
Basically, I'm going to continue working on my [DCMI](https://github.com/DanielOaks/dcmi)
protocol, get that to a point where I'm happy with it and _then_ start looking at S2S
linking properly. If anyone is interested in server protocols and wants to look at this with
me, please feel free to reach out!
## Rehashing
Rehashing is reloading the config files and TLS certificates. Of course, you can rehash the
server by connect, opering-up and using the `/REHASH` command. However, similar to other
IRCds, you can also make the server rehash by sending an appropriate signal to it!
To make the server rehash from the command line, send it a `SIGHUP` signal. In *nix and OSX,
you can do this by performing the following command:
killall -HUP oragono
This will make the server rehash its configuration files and TLS certificates, and so can be
useful if you're automatically updating your TLS certs!
2017-07-01 21:38:33 +00:00
## Rejected Features
'Rejected' sounds harsh, but basically these are features I've decided I'm not gonna
implement in Oragono (at least, not until someone convinces me they're worth doing).
### Force/Auto-Join Channels on Connect
When a user connects, some IRC servers let you force-join them to a given channel. For
instance, this could be a channel like `#coolnet` for a network named CoolNet, a lobby
channel, or something similar.
My main objection to having this feature is just that I don't like it that much. It doesn't
seem nice to forcibly join clients to a channel, and I know I'm always annoyed when networks
do it to me.
To network operators that want to do this, I'd suggest instead mentioning the channel(s) in
your MOTD so that your users know the channels exist! If they want to join in, they can do
it from there :)